🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam order, the nation's top court cleared the way for Texas to use a newly configured congressional map that is projected to include as many as five new Republican-leaning districts. The 6-3 order, released on Thursday, upholds a request by the state to overturn a federal judge's ruling that had struck down the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Rationale

The federal judge improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and disturbing the delicate balance of power in elections, the order stated in justifying its ruling.

The district court had determined that Texas had likely sorted voters according to their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to use the districts established after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

With a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's ruling. She contended that it disregarded the work of the lower court, pointing out that its opinion was actually authored by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a violation of the law of the land.

Countrywide Redistricting Battle

This decision is part of a national fight over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican control. Usually, map-drawing happens after a ten-year survey. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that might create several more GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, in response, have responded with new maps in including California and Virginia, which could offset those projected gains.

Partisan Responses

Lone Star State top lawyer praised the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes favorable to his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

In contrast, opposition party representatives lamented the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major Democratic election organization.

A senior House figure argued the court had another time shredded its credibility by approving a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.